What Does derive coulomb's as a special case of guass law Mean?
What Does derive coulomb's as a special case of guass law Mean?
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents on the boy or Lady will not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they're able to Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who's a major, the few is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were perfectly aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, as being the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he has actually been acquitted of your criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually properly-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted during the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. In the meantime police shall remain neutral from the private dispute between the parties, however, if any from the individuals is indulged in criminal exercise the police shall consider prompt action against them under legislation. five. The instant petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Within the United States, men and women are not required to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their very own can remember a person rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as you possibly can, leading the court, not only for the case, but to your section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it's unclear how it applies to any given situation, normally rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers and also the circumstances in the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that website finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety days to the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]
eight. With the reasons stated higher than, this court finds the petition to generally be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is thus acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are also dismissed. Read more
The figured out Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced from the findings inside the Impugned order, after recording of evidence on the respective parties. Read more